The pouring of refugees from war torn countries into the West is creating a lot of angry groups and protests in the West. Some countries in the West are beginning to refuse more refugees. Some countries in the West have been refused any refugee from the beginning. Yet the wars in the Middle East and elsewhere are still raging on. If more wars are going to break out, we should see even more refugees seek migration toward the West. How will the West handle even more refugees when the current refugee acceptance level is already intolerable?
By the way, I believe in the etiquette of common sense such as a guest should never rudely wreck a host’s home. Thus I don’t think it’s right for refugees to refuse to assimilate into a host country, after all such a country is providing aid to the refugees. Common sense also tells me that a host country should either accept the refugees with care or not accept any refugee, because doing anything else would just be egregiously inhuman. Of course, the refugees should follow all laws and rules of a host country, because refugees should not have any crazy advantage and illegal leeway over regular citizens of the host country. I think the host country should declare clear rules and regulations in accepting refugees and then enforce such means in decisive, humane and lawful manners. By doing the right things right, we can bring peace toward all sides. Sometimes though, it’s better to not do anything at all so an uglier mess won’t be forming.
Meanwhile, extremists who are using religions to brainwash people are only fueling more hatreds around the world. In my opinion, if a religion which promotes killing and forcefully coerce people into a belief is not a real religion, more like a devil worship cult. The things a legitimate religion should cherish most are love, compassion, peace, and relative moral values that fit with time. Also, a religion should have no business in politics and government.
With science, a religion should be open minded about the advances of humankind. When a religion makes science as an enemy, it’s when a religion is really sliding backward into time. Such a religion isn’t belonging to the future of humankind, because progress of humankind should be the ultimate priority. Only progress could we eventually save ourselves from true extinction. We don’t want to become just like the dinosaurs who went extinct forever, because their fossils are the strongest warnings to us all. Of course, nothing can outlast time, and so we can’t delude ourselves in believing that humankind will be forever lasted, but at least progress can stretch out the timeline of true extinction. Without progress and in a nuclear age, I think we are setting ourselves up for hell on earth. Thus, we don’t need more problems such as violent religions that coerce people into a belief. What we need is more humankind progress in general — such as science and humankind civilities.
In my opinion, when a religion starts to coerce somebody into a belief, it’s when such a religion should be demoted to a dangerous cult. We humans are not robots, because we have a brain to think. We should be able to question a belief without being killed or persecuted in any harmful way. As long we don’t go around and coerce people into our own belief, we should be able to question any belief in peaceful manner. A civilization cannot be called a civilization when people are harming each other for one’s own belief.
I can only see more dead people walking when fake religions promote love through killing and hatreds. Religion goes wrong can only fuel even more wars in this “already madly in love with wars” world. Without further ado, check out the videos right after the break to see how the West has been coping with inundation of refugees.