Winner Takes All In Term Of Media Will Have To Fully Support And Simplify The Internet In The Living Room

Living room 01335

Living room 01335 (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

How ironic this is!  I’d moved away from watching TV to watching the Internet through computers and laptops, but now I’m moving back to watching TV more than ever.  OK, before the folks who support the traditional media such as Cable companies and the folks who support the new media such as the Internet get the wrong idea of what I had said, let me clear this up right now.  Instead of watching more TV in a normal and traditional sense, I hug the TV only when Apple TV and iPad 2 are humming in symphony.  Thanks to Airplay, iPad 2 has became a remote control for the Internet, and the TV has once again became my gateway to entertainment, politics, learning, gasping moments, laughing moments, and host of other senses.  As more people are changing their behaviors in term of accessing media as I have been doing so in the living room, we are going to see the landscape of the media will evermore be drastically changed for some time to come.

Questions arise when we question what will happen to the traditional media if people are demanding for the Internet to be streamed to their devices evermore, especially to devices that anchor in the living room.  Such questions are:

  • Will traditional Cable companies survive if more people like me don’t use the traditional media more and more?
  • What changes the traditional Cable companies have to adopt in order for them to find hope for their future?
  • How come smart TV isn’t yet a big of a deal even though people are demanding for the Internet to be streamed evermore?
  • Can tablets such as iPad be a more favorable form of remote control than the standard stick-like TV remote control for the TV of the future?
  • Will the Internet has to be faster, cheaper, and bigger (in term of bandwidth) in order for people to be able to enjoy the Internet as their TV media?
  • Will advertisement programs be weaved in a way that do not obstruct the enjoyment of having the Internet as the TV media in the near future?
  • Will the tablet form factor be more important in term of TV computing than general computing for the consumers in the near future?
  • If the tablets will be evermore important to the living room, what will become of the suggestion that the tablet form factor will kill off the desktop form factor?
  • Will the average people get to be evermore informed if the Internet will constantly be watched in the living room in the near future?
  • Will the media industry come up with simpler Internet TV technology so average folks can connect to the Internet through TV, 24/7, easier?
  • Should the sectors within the media industry of today that embrace the Internet in the living room think about promoting less on wonder TV techs and just promote the simplification of any technology which deals with having the Internet in the living room?
  • Will culture in whatever country change dramatically as the Internet overtakes the living room?
  • Will live Internet (such as live stream of whatever) be the revolution of live TV?
  • How will the people of the future define their particular trustworthy sources when the Internet overtakes the living room in the near future?

Of course, if I think harder, I might come up with more questions in regarding to what if and how the Internet will change people/consumers’ lives and behaviors when the Internet overtakes the TV in the living room of most Americans and elsewhere.  Nonetheless, no matter what will become of the TV of the future, right now I feel that the iPad that supports Airplay feature is just an amazing technology which has me crazily hug my TV again.  Before, I prefer to watch the Internet whatever from a small, computer monitor or a tiny, laptop monitor.  Now, thanks to Apple TV device, I prefer the big screen TV as the Internet is streaming to it.  YouTube has been so far my go to place for most stream videos in my living room.  With extremely satisfactory personal experience from watching the Internet in my living room, I predict (rolling my eyes when I use the word predict) that whoever or whatever can make the Internet easier in the living room will be the victor of the next media in term of entertainment and technology industries.  What do you think?

Todd Weaver’s Ivy To Fight For Live TV Over The Internet In Court

Watching live TV over the Internet is definitely an ultimate experience for many people of the 21st century.  Why?  The Internet isn’t the same as traditional cable and other traditional media, because the Internet encourages freedom.  What freedom?  The Internet is even worse than radio in a way that it tends to be promoted on every device as possible; it really doesn’t matter what device as long it has the mean to be connected to the Internet — even radio is on the Internet nowadays.  So, the freedom of the Internet is all about users will have more choices to experience the Internet however they please.  Consequently, anything has to do with the Internet will give users more choices to experience it!  Be it TV or radio or whatever!

Unfortunately, bringing live TV to the Internet isn’t easy as Todd Weaver has found.  According to Forbes, Todd Weaver is trying to keep his company, Ivi, alive, but he has to win court battle against the people who are suing him for trying to bring live TV to the Internet.  Todd Weaver uses examples of how cable and satellite providers established their footholds back in the days when these types of providers were still fairly young — as how the Internet is today.  He argues that the cable and satellite providers had won cases in courts, because the courts had agreed that these providers had not violated copyright law as long the content creators got paid fairly.  Tod Weaver is trying to tell the court that his company Ivy is just doing the same thing as cable and satellite providers had done in the past, and so his company should be able to air live TV programs over the Internet as long he is willing to pay the content providers.

Personally, I love the idea, and I’m all for Todd Weaver’s victory in trying to bring live TV to the Internet.  Why?  His victory can set a standard court battle for whoever wants to bring live contents to the Internet.  The most important thing is that when live TV programs and similar types of media air over the Internet, it can only mean that any device with compatible technology (i.e., HD resolution and so on) which supports Internet will be able to play live TV programs.  More people are going to be able to tap into live TV programs on the go or wherever they are with Internet connection.  Of course, live TV programs can also bring side effects such as pushing the Internet Service Providers to upgrade their networks to support constant streaming of live TV programs to gazillion devices.  Of course, we won’t be able to know what benefits or calamities that the side effects of live TV will bring to the industries that involve with Internet.  Industries such as marketing, Internet Service Providers, and many more will probably have to change how they will interact with their customers once the Pandora box of live TV over the Internet is opened.