Image by x-av via Flickr

A commenter oridade on YouTube points out that the title of a YouTube video (***30-story building built in 15 days*** Construction time lapse *View Fullscreen*) is clearly and utterly misleading.  Instead, oridade points out that the video only shows the 30 story building is being assembled within 15 days.  Still, for assembling a 30 story building with the latest technologies within 15 days is quite a feat nonetheless.  The latest technologies that are being installed inside this 30 story building enable the building itself to withstand 9 magnitude earthquake resistance, have 5 times more energy efficient, have 4-paned window type, have internal window insulation for windows, have 20 times purer air, and monitor air quality for each and every room of the building.  It seems that Broad Group is the Chinese company which had pulled off this feat.  This 30 story building is now a hotel prototype, according to the information below the YouTube video which you can watch right after the break.  Enough reading, why not check out the YouTube time lapse video to see the assembling of China‘s 30 story building in 15 days for yourself right after the break.

Related articles

• Video news: 30-storey hotel was built in just 15 days (thesun.co.uk)
• TIMELAPSE: 30-Story Building Built in 15 Days (VIDEO) (blippitt.com)
• The 30-story hotel built in only 15 days [video] (holykaw.alltop.com)
• Amazing Timelapse of 30-Story Building Constructed In Only 360 Hours (gizmodo.co.uk)
• Amazing Timelapse of 30-Story Building Constructed In Only 360 Hours [Video] (gizmodo.com)
• 30-story Hotel Built in 15 Days in China (Video) (dailypicksandflicks.com)
• China Broad Group constructs 30 story building in 15 days (nextbigfuture.com)
• China builds a 30-story skyscraper entirely in 2 weeks [Video] (io9.com)

Image by MarkWallace via Flickr

China is smartly moving into 3D TV trend and trying to stay ahead of the pack so even when its economy might slow down for any odd number of reasons, China is still likely to attract advertisers like crazy so more inflow of profits can flow in.  According to Physorg, Chinese think that the new 3D channel might increase demand for 3D TV sets.  If more Chinese people buy up 3D TV sets, there will be more money to be made for 3D TV makers.  If we look at a much bigger picture though, more 3D TV sets in more Chinese homes might create even more opportunities to make even more money for advertisers and companies alike.

It’s well known that China has a biggest population in the world, numbering in a billion plus, and so it’s also likely now a richer/wealthier China presents a special circumstance where more Chinese are hungry for better, bigger, and more advanced whatever.  My guess is that Chinese might become even more hungry for consumptions than how Americans are.  This is why I think it’s a smart move for the Chinese government to allow test launch of 3D TV channel.

According to Physorg, the channel is free and will be officially launched on January 23rd, coinciding with Chinese New Year.  The new 3D TV channel launch is a move to encourage Chinese people to consume more 3D TV sets, but let not forget that more Chinese might buy more products when they see more awesome 3D commercials.  Perhaps, the Chinese government is thinking by driving their people to consume more whatever, there will be more demands for everything, and this includes more employers seek out for more employees so their companies can be even more productive in producing more goods.  Consequently, the trend might encourage Chinese economy to grow even bigger or prevent a slowing down of Chinese economic extraordinary growth rate.

Then again, we have to ask what if Chinese are driving to consume to a point of overconsumption, would this be a foresight to how more Chinese will spend beyond their means?  If overconsumption might become a big problem for future China, might we see a second United States?  After all, more people within the United States are spending beyond their means, and so we’ve seen how hard it’s for the people within the United States to regain their financial strengths during a recession and post recession era.  Nonetheless, if China is willing to consume, the world might also be more prosperous since Chinese people might want to import more luxurious foreign stuffs from countries such as the United States.  This means countries that are doing business with China might have to ramp up their exports in the near future.

Regardless how China will demand for consumptions, I think large pools of wealthy Chinese will drive up the demands for foreign goods.  Chinese government is helping to push the demand for consumption further by encouraging their people to consume more.  What’s better to do that by allowing people to watch more 3D TV commercials and entertainment shows?  By the way, I’m just speculating from one opinionated angle, therefore you have to take my idiotic, bold assessment of how China will go for consumption through 3D TV trend with a grain of salt.  It’s obvious that a country is complex as China, we can never pinpoint on one thing and say this is how China will behave.  You can say this post is for your entertainment only!

Source:  http://www.physorg.com/news/2012-01-china-test-launches-3d-tv-channel.html

Related articles

• China launches 3D TV channel (bbc.co.uk)
• China launches first 3D TV channel (ibnlive.in.com)
• China Launches 3D TV Channels (socyberty.com)
• China launches its first 3D television channel (zdnet.com)
• Why Apple Won’t Release a 3D TV (forbes.com)
• LG preps lighter, more fashionable 3D TV glasses (electronista.com)
• LG to debut the holy grail TV at CES: 84-inch 3D ‘ultra definition’ TV (dvice.com)
• LG Reveals More Details About 84-Inch 3D TV (inquisitr.com)
• LG Electronics Unveils World’s First Commercial Ultra High-Definition Stereo-3D TV (xbitlabs.com)
• LG details 84-inch, 4K-capable 3D TV (electronista.com)

Image via Wikipedia

There are folks who champion Thorium as the safest nuclear energy.  I’ve written about it in the article “Can Thorium Be The Only One Element That Energizes The World Of The Future?” — and now there is Bill Gates who champions depleted uranium to be used in new nuclear technology which he said it would be the safest nuclear energy yet.  He also said this new nuclear technology requires no human intervention and it is still going to be safe.  You can read Huffingtonpost’s article “Bill Gates’ China Nuclear Reactor Project: Microsoft Co-Founder Aims To Develop Safer Version” for more details on Bill Gates’ pushing for new nuclear technology which requires depleted uranium.

Source:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/12/07/bill-gates-china-nuclear-reactor-project_n_1134359.html

Related articles

• Bill Gates working with China on new nuclear reactor (mercurynews.com)
• Bill Gates touts Chinese nuclear reactor (bizjournals.com)
• Bill Gates Going Nuclear With China (mashable.com)
• Bill Gates talks to China about developing new kind of nuclear reactor (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Bill Gates and China in discussions over new nuclear reactor (guardian.co.uk)
• Bill Gates in talks with China National Nuclear Corporation for Terrapower nuclear reactor (nextbigfuture.com)
• Bill Gates, China jointly developing nuclear reactor – CBC.ca (cbc.ca)
• Bill Gates Discussing New Nuclear Reactor With China (online.wsj.com)
• Bill Gates talks with China about developing new kind of nuclear reactor (seattletimes.nwsource.com)
• Bill Gates and China may build nuclear reactor (independent.co.uk)
• Can Thorium Be The Only One Element That Energizes The World Of The Future? (essayboard.com)

Image via Wikipedia

As financial instruments that keep nations stay healthy find to be less effective, nations are facing direr prospects of having to see their economies slowly inch closer to unsustainable conditions.  Imagine China continues to see United States prints more dollars out of thin air to devalue the dollar so United States’ exports can be competitive against the rest of the world, and China will face higher import costs to produce lesser profitable export goods since Chinese yuan is pegging against dollar.  As China isn’t so willingly to revalue yuan and allowing yuan to appreciate against dollar, China forces United States to print more money than ever to devalue the dollar so United States can stay competitive in exporting its goods.  United States knowing that exporting more will create jobs at home, consequently taming the wild beasts of deflation and unemployment that will lead to a healthier economy in near term or however long the United States can print money and China won’t scream foul.

Let assume China and United States are going to be locked in a currency war for a long time to come, and the financial instruments of both sides aren’t that effective since both sides might be able to dish out comparable damages, a tic for tac kind of things.  Seeing from this perspective, one can see why United States is so concerning about cyber security.  Once the usual financial instruments aren’t that effective, an oppose entity (e.g., nation, country, faction, coalition, and so on) can try to use a stealthier and more malicious mean to gain some advantages in regarding to world trade and a nation’s financial matters, and we’re talking of hacking.  Of course, there are many other means that might be as vicious as hacking or even more vicious than hacking such as intentionally manipulating an opposing nation’s derivative market to a point that such market would crash and create havocs within a nation’s economy.  Nonetheless, hacking is probably one of the easiest maneuvers which one nation can carry out against another nation.

Hacking can be inexpensive for the hackers and yet sometimes hackers can get more than what they want.  Hackers can also stay anonymous if they’re good, therefore hacking can be stealthy if stealth is important to the hackers.  Knowing hacking can be carried out with precision and with almost no consequence at state sponsor level, I don’t see why hacking is not one of the desirable methods in acquiring financial information and gaining sensitive data to manipulate another nation’s economy.  This is why it’s not unimaginable for the United States to consider hacking as an act of war and might lead to military actions.  As more facets of an economy come online or digitize, hacking can become an evermore dangerous and powerful instrument among other financial instruments to be used by nations.  Of course, hacking isn’t always motivating by financial means, sometimes it’s more about gaining military advance weaponries.  This is why hacking can become even more important than just a covert financial instrument for any nation.

So, I guess we can expect China and United States to continue playing a game of blaming each other on how they got hacked by the opposing nation.  I suspect that the United States and China won’t go as far as declaring war on each other if indeed they find out that the opposing party is hacking them, but I can see United States and China won’t be hesitating in punishing weaker opposing enemies in all means, even things has to boil down to carrying out some military actions.  Don’t be surprised to see more headlines of how one nation is hacking another in the news, because hacking can be quite a useful financial instrument and more.  It’s that serious!

Source —  Currency Wars:  The Making of the Next Global Crisis by James Rikards (book).

Related articles

• Obama tells China: boost yuan or face consequences (independent.co.uk)
• The fleecing of America: The United States Covered Bond Act of 2011 (ppjg.wordpress.com)
• U.S. China News 2011.11.26 (americachina.wordpress.com)
• Chinese paper says hacking claim ‘irresponsible’ (seattlepi.com)
• China hits back over US claims of satellite hacking (guardian.co.uk)
• The Chinese Way of Hacking (fastcompany.com)
• China says to get tougher in fight against computer hacking (canada.com)
• Obama Bolsters his ‘Pacific President’ Credentials in Asia Trip (usnews.com)
• The spies behind your screen (telegraph.co.uk)
• China steps up fight against computer hacking (guardian.co.uk)
• China’s rising yuan rising no more? (business.financialpost.com)
• China Bends to U.S. Complaint on Solar Panels but Plans Retaliation (kleenergyecosystems.wordpress.com)
• US committee warns of yuan threat (bbc.co.uk)
• Obama’s Policies Make China Stronger And The U.S. Weaker (forbes.com)
• China Could Post First Trade Deficit In Two Decades (huffingtonpost.com)
• U.S. Amps-Up Pressure on China to Let Yuan Rise (ibtimes.com)
• China to trade yuan against Aussie dollar (news.theage.com.au)
• Obama presses China on yuan – Channel NewsAsia (kara-advisors.com)
• Malaysian hacker jailed in US (rightways.wordpress.com)
• STEEL (no, not steal) FROM CHINA – Part 2/2 (ilookchina.net)
• China to investigate U.S. renewable energy policies as trade conflict escalates (oregonlive.com)
• Ron Paul: Printed Money Is America’s Biggest Export. (politicalvelcraft.org)
• BOOK: Bernanke amps up currency war with China… (therepublika.com)
• Wen Says China to Keep Yuan Basically Stable (online.wsj.com)
• Letter: ‘I pledge allegiance to the United States of America;’ make that, ‘to my party’ (tcpalm.com)
• Economics | The Robin Hood Tax (mike10613.wordpress.com)
• Emerging Markets Report: China currency appreciation may soon end: analysts (marketwatch.com)
• Yuan to replace dollar in 10 years (rt.com)
• Talks on Cluster Bomb Restrictions Collapse (nytimes.com)
• Guest Post: What’s Lost With the Demise of the Euro? Only What Was Unsustainable (zerohedge.com)
• China is world’s largest smart-phone market (textually.org)
• China Yuchai Announces Issuance of Short-Term Financing Bonds by its Key Subsidiary (prnewswire.com)
• How the United States Is Like, and Unlike, Greece – Posner (becker-posner-blog.com)

E-waste is multiplying everyday as we continue to abandon a year or two year old electronic products so we can gobble up new ones that come out yesterday or so.  Before most e-waste end up in the landfills, these abandon electronic things tend to collect dust in closets and garages.  Eventually, to free up the space of closets and garages, people have to discard their e-waste in landfills.

So what is the problem with throwing e-waste in landfills?  As I read, I notice the complaints of health risks that are associating with having e-waste to be leached away in landfills and having e-waste to be recycled in unsafe manners.  Many toxic elements (e.g., lead, cadmium, mercury, americium, sulphur, BFRs, beryllium oxide) come from e-waste that are not appropriately contained can be health hazardous to humans.

Let see how health hazardous it is for lead to be leaked into our environment through possible routes such as air, soil, water, food, and consumer products.  Quoting directly from Wikipedia, lead can be dangerous to human health as how it’s described below:

Lead poisoning (also known as plumbism, colica Pictonum, saturnism, Devon colic, or painter’s colic) is a medical condition caused by increased levels of theheavy metal lead in the body. Lead interferes with a variety of body processes and is toxic to many organs and tissues including the heart, bones, intestines, kidneys, and reproductive and nervous systems. It interferes with the development of the nervous system and is therefore particularly toxic to children, causing potentially permanent learning and behavior disorders. Symptoms include abdominal pain, confusion, headache, anemia, irritability, and in severe cases seizures, coma, and death.  Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lead_poisoning

Quoting directly from Wikipedia, Cadmium poisoning can be dangerous to human health as how it’s described below:

Acute exposure to cadmium fumes may cause flu like symptoms including chills, fever, and muscle ache sometimes referred to as “the cadmium blues.” Symptoms may resolve after a week if there is no respiratory damage. More severe exposures can cause tracheo-bronchitis, pneumonitis, and pulmonary edema. Symptoms of inflammation may start hours after the exposure and include cough, dryness and irritation of the nose and throat, headache, dizziness, weakness, fever, chills, and chest pain.

Inhaling cadmium-laden dust quickly leads to respiratory tract and kidney problems which can be fatal (often from renal failure). Ingestion of any significant amount of cadmium causes immediate poisoning and damage to the liver and the kidneys. Compounds containing cadmium are also carcinogenic[citation needed].

The bones become soft (osteomalacia), lose bone mineral density (osteoporosis) and become weaker. This causes the pain in the joints and the back, and also increases the risk of fractures. In extreme cases of cadmium poisoning, mere body weight causes a fracture.

The kidneys lose their function to remove acids from the blood in proximal renal tubular dysfunction. The kidney damage inflicted by cadmium poisoning is irreversible. The proximal renal tubular dysfunction creates low phosphate levels in the blood (hypophosphatemia), causing muscle weakness and sometimes coma. The dysfunction also causes gout, a form of arthritis due to the accumulation of uric acid crystals in the joints because of high acidity of the blood (hyperuricemia). Another side effect is increased levels of chloride in the blood (hyperchloremia). The kidneys can also shrink up to 30%.

Other patients lose their sense of smell (anosmia). Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium_poisoning

Quoting directly from Wikipedia, Mercury poisoning can be dangerous to human health as how it’s described below:

Toxic effects include damage to the brain, kidney, and lungs.[1] Mercury poisoning can result in several diseases, including acrodynia (pink disease)[2], Hunter-Russell syndrome, and Minamata disease.[3]  Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_poisoning

Mercury: found in fluorescent tubes (numerous applications), tilt switches (mechanical doorbells, thermostats),[38] and flat screen monitors. Health effects include sensory impairment, dermatitis, memory loss, and muscle weakness. Environmental effects in animals include death, reduced fertility, slower growth and development.  Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste

Americium is known to be carcinogenic.  To put this in another way, Americium can cause cancers.

Quoting directly from Wikipedia, Sulphur can be dangerous to human health as how it’s described below:

Sulphur: found in lead-acid batteries. Health effects include liver damage, kidney damage, heart damage, eye and throat irritation. When released in to the environment, it can create sulphuric acid.  Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste

Quoting directly from Wikipedia, BFRs can be dangerous to human health as how it’s described below:

BFRs: Used as flame retardants in plastics in most electronics. Includes PBBs, PBDE, DecaBDE, OctaBDE, PentaBDE. Health effects include impaired development of the nervous system, thyroid problems, liver problems. Environmental effects: similar effects as in animals as humans. PBBs were banned from 1973-1977 on. PCBs were banned during the 1980′s.  Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste

Quoting directly from Wikipedia, Beryllium Oxide can be dangerous to human health as how it’s described below:

Beryllium oxide: filler in some thermal interface materials such as thermal grease used on heatsinks for CPUs and power transistors,[41] magnetrons, X-ray-transparent ceramic windows, heat transfer fins in vacuum tubes, and gas lasers.  Source:  http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Electronic_waste

Many developed countries acknowledge the health issues that are associating with e-waste, and so these countries have laws that restrict or ban the importation of e-waste from abroad.  Although many developing countries know the health issues that are associating with e-waste, these countries somewhat lack in regulations to prevent the importation of e-waste.  China passed law to prevent the importation of e-waste, but the law was and is ineffective from stopping the massive illegal importation of e-waste.  A YouTube video below shows desperate Chinese who work for very little money in recycling e-waste factory of sort — these folks confront with health issues and problems that are responsible by the unsafe handling of e-waste.

Europe has proposed a law that requires big electronic retailers (including online retailers) to accept e-waste from consumers.  To know more about this law, check out the article “New EU Proposals on E-waste to Help Consumers Recycle.”

In conclusion, e-waste is health hazardous when recycling or disposing e-waste improperly.  E-waste can grow faster, because electronic market has become ever more competitive.  More electronic products come out at faster pace, and prices for these products have become very affordable.  These changes encourage consumers to acquire more of newer electronic products at faster pace, giving way to filling up the landfills faster with abandoned e-waste.  Without wanting to accumulate e-waste, developed countries tend to illegally ship e-waste to developing countries for unsafe e-waste recycling and handling.  To solve the e-waste problem, we need to promote the use of greener electronic products (i.e., friendlier to the environments).  Perhaps, even that will not be able to cut back the disposable of e-waste, but at least greener e-waste (i.e., less toxic) will be somewhat safer to humans.

Sources:  http://www.greenpeace.org/international/en/campaigns/toxics/electronics/the-e-waste-problem/where-does-e-waste-end-up/, http://www.pcworld.com/article/241060/new_eu_proposals_on_ewaste_
to_help_consumers_recycle.html#tk.rss_news, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/
Electronic_waste, http://www.dosomething.org/tipsandtools/11-facts-about-e-waste, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mercury_poisoning, http://en.wikipedia.org
/wiki/Lead_poisoning, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cadmium_poisoning

According to China Daily, China’s driverless car was tested in difficult conditions such as fog and thundershower and unclear lane markings.  The test shown that China’s driverless car overtook human drivers 67 times and was able to cope with humans’ driving behaviors such as abrupt lane changes.  Perhaps, adding GPS capability to China’s driverless car will make it one of the first driverless cars to be smart and safe at the same time?

Source:  http://www.chinadaily.com.cn/cndy/2011-08/03/content_13037633.htm

Imagine, one nation can hack into another nation digital infrastructure so the activity of rendering one’s nation banking and intelligence systems useless, the whole idea in itself is scaring the heck out of each nation.  I think by now, it’s a known fact that many nations are using the digital world to formulate all types of plans such as monitoring the intentions of the enemy!  Without staying ahead of one another, how one nation knows that its intelligence has the right information to keep its nation safe?

Albeit, physical destruction has to be the last resort, but before such measure to be carried out, I think many nations of the world will try to outmaneuver one another through the medium of Internet.  Perhaps, the Internet may be up for a consideration of total control, and who shall control the Internet?  In the meantime, more and more news are reporting about group after group of hackers have successfully penetrated and compromised important entities.  United States has had seen so much hacking activities came from China, and China denies all of that.  In return, China says that she herself is also a target of hackers.

Cnet is reporting president Obama has laid out cyberwar guidelines.  The article isn’t thorough at all, but it does point out one interesting aspect as to increase cyberwar effort.  So, I guess we are going to see a trend of evermore unrest in the digital world, whether that be coming from China or U.S. or any other country that wants to participate in the cyber conflict.  So the question is, can cyberwar be more damaging than wars that require weapons and dead bodies?