According to Gizmodo‘s article “That Unbelievable $19 Unlimited Data/Voice/Text Plan Is Truly Unlimited,” Republic Wireless is now allowing customers to use the minutes, texts, and data as they see fit without having to worry about getting throttles, and the plan is still only $19 per month.  I do somewhat worry what if Sprint decides it doesn’t like this idea some months down the road?  After all, Republic Wireless is piggybacking Sprint’s wireless network.

Oh, never mind, don’t you worry too much, because if you are worrying about Sprint, then you never know how good it might feel when having unlimited minutes, texts, and data for your smart phones.  Did I use smartphone as in its plural form (i.e., smartphones)?  See, even if you get two or three smartphones with Republic Wireless, it seems you are saving so much money still that you might just have to give them customers of AT&T-Verizon-other-big-wireless-carriers your arrogant smirks, because you can do so.  So, don’t hold back you smirky, you.

Update:  I forgot to tell you that you don’t have to sign a contract to use Republic Wireless $19 unlimited wireless plan!  Give me five!

Source:  http://gizmodo.com/5870753/that-unbelievable-19-unlimited-datavoicetext-plan-is-truly-unlimited

Related articles

• Republic Wireless Commits To Truly Unlimited Service – Revises Old Policy For The Holidays (droidflash.wordpress.com)
• Republic Wireless Changes Terms, Allows Unlimited 3G Data Access (inquisitr.com)
• Republic Wireless to Ditch Fair Use, Goes Unlimited (phonescoop.com)
• Republic Wireless Unlimited Service: Now Less Limiting (technologizer.com)
• Republic Wireless Offers $19 Unlimited Wireless Plan Per Month (essayboard.com)
• MVNO Republic Wireless to go truly unlimited, will eliminate cellular fair-use policy (fiercewireless.com)
• Republic Wireless commits to unrestricted unlimited 3G data (electronista.com)
• Republic Wireless changes stance: unlimited will be truly unlimited, ‘no thresholds’ or asterisks (engadget.com)
• MVNO Republic Wireless to go truly unlimited, will eliminate cellular fair-use policy (nfcdata.com)
• Republic Wireless will have an unlimited plan for $19 a month (gadgetell.com)
• Are you in AT&T’s top 5 percent of heaviest data users? (news.cnet.com)
• 4 Money-Saving Gadgets That Make Perfect Last-Minute Gifts (businessinsider.com)

Image via Wikipedia

To my current knowledge, several broadband and cable companies are giving out free Internet Security software to their customers.  AT&T customers can download McAfee Internet Security for free; Comcast customers can download Norton Security Suite for free.  Other broadband and cable companies might have their own security products as well, and so nowadays I don’t think it’s necessary for users who use broadband and cable to buy their own Internet Security software.

If you aren’t sure about being able to download free security product from your Internet service provider, you can call your ISP and ask about their free security product.  Of course, you can always switch to a better ISP that provides you top of the line security product.  If you think your ISP is faster and cheaper than any other ISP and yet you can’t download a free security product, then I guess you need to buy a standalone security product from a well known security company such as Symantec and stay loyal to your ISP.

In conclusion, broadband and cable companies such as AT&T are doing a great job in protecting their customers by providing free security software.  The Internet is somewhat less hazardous to huge pools of people who can download and install free security products from their ISPs.  So, don’t you go out and waste money on a standalone security product before you ask your ISP for a similar product first, OK?  Good luck!

Related articles

• McAfee Internet Security ’08 – Ten Layers of Security (brighthub.com)
• Review: McAfee protects your Mac without affecting performance (macworld.com)
• Best Steps to Protect Family and Computers Online During the Holidays (prweb.com)
• Jumpto Lets You Access The Internet With Complete Security And Privacy (alltopstartups.com)
• McAfee Protects Your Mac Without Affecting Performance (pcworld.com)
• Internet Security Software that is effective, easy to use, and affordably priced (examiner.com)

Image via Wikipedia

Reading Steve Jobs‘ biography written by Walter Isaacson, one could see that Steve Jobs had wanted to create his own wireless carrier.  Steve Jobs had always obsessed with making sure that Apple would be the one that got the final say on user experience.  Steve Jobs had not wanted to have Apple’s partners dictated how the users would see Apple products, therefore he had decided to create his own retail stores (i.e., Apple stores).  The same thing could be said how Steve Jobs took the wall garden approach to Apple applications as these were and are being tightly integrated and guarded within Apple App Store.  So, it was painful for Steve Jobs to see that he had to put up with how things weren’t in his control when it came down to wireless network.  Perhaps for certain difficulties that proved to be too illusive to solve when it came to create a wireless carrier, therefore he had abandoned the approach and copulated with AT&T exclusively from the start.  Of course, now we know that Apple folks are at the point where they will work with just any carrier, and so the exclusivity which AT&T enjoyed earlier is no longer in place.  This explains how Verizon and the rest got to sell iPhone 4S.

Image by stevegarfield via Flickr

The question is this, is it wise to use Steve Jobs’ wall garden approach for everything, even with wireless carrier, so the business could provide better user experience and boost bottom line?  I think in some moving parts that responsible for the health of certain businesses, it’s not wise to use wall garden approach.  Why?  Perhaps, when a business is well known for not being talented with something might take the wrong approach and end up creating a disaster.  With that being said, I still think Steve Jobs is right about Apple should have its very own wireless carrier.  After all, what is important most to a business should be run by its own master to ensure the ultimate customer experience stays positive!

Just imagine several major wireless carriers could band together to form a coalition of sort to demand Apple to work with them in limited terms, would this be unreasonable to Apple?  Perhaps, because Apple might not be able to provide the ultimate customer/user experience when Apple could not dictate how their very own customers/users enjoy staying connected.  Some people might argue that Apple should be OK as long their products sell in millions.  Sure, Apple could make its competitors rage with envy when it comes down to selling products, but customers could eventually hate Apple for not providing better customer/user experience.  Perhaps this was why Steve Jobs knew and created Apple’s own retailer stores while his advisors were against the very idea in the first place.  Steve Jobs’s advisors and colleagues pointed out that Dell did not own retailer stores and yet had been doing fine; also, HP and others were doing fine without owning their own retailer stores for they worked with various retailer distributors such as Best Buy.  Steve Jobs was right as Apple stores boosted Apple sales.  As seeing the success of Apple stores, I have to wonder should Apple be even more successful if it had its own wireless carrier?

Wireless carriers are a major part of determining how customers/users feel about Apple products, this is why Steve Jobs might have been right about having Apple to run its own wireless carrier.  To explain why wireless carriers are a major moving part of Apple’s overall business strategy, one has to recognize that without reliable and fast wireless carriers, Apple products are just cumbersome and dull; perhaps with few self-contained software and games.  This might not be enough for today customers/users since today world emphasizes more on staying connected with the Internet (i.e., the world).  This explains why data can determine customers/users’ interests and joys and connections and social interactions and e-commerce and everything.  Therefore, Apple products end up just represent the hardware side, and we know when hardware have no software, nobody would care!  In today world, we also to have acknowledge that when hardware have no data, nobody would care!  This is why as one appreciates the wall garden approach of Steve Jobs, one has to recognize Apple needs to create its own wireless carrier.

As now, major wireless carriers complain users are using too much data that put strains on their networks.  Instead of finding real solutions to make customers/users stay happy, several major wireless networks have combatted heavy data by selling limited wireless plans; they think limiting how customers/users use data might deter users from using too much data.  Raising costs and limiting users the ability to use wireless networks freely, I fear one cannot say customers/users are having good experience with wireless carriers.  I don’t think the ultimate experience of using something is to be limited.  It is not so good experience when one can only watch half of a great film and not the rest.  It is not so good experience when one can only lick a cake but not eat it.  It is not so good experience when one can only smell the wine but not drink it.  So on and so on… Therefore it’s not so good experience when one cannot stream data on the go freely.  This is why it’s not a bad idea to see even if there is only one more wireless carrier enters the wireless market to boost competition, lower down the costs, and improve customer/user experience.  Should Apple be the one more wireless carrier to make Apple users happier?

It’s a hypocrite of me to support open movement and not so a fish tank approach to mobile apps and yet I wish Steve Jobs’ own wireless carrier should have happened.  Still, for Apple users’ greater good, I like the idea of Apple having its own wireless carrier (Hint: notice how I say for Apple users’ greater good only).  I think with Apple’s own wireless carrier, Apple can carry out its wall garden approach fully to improve customer/user experience.  Of course, I think wall garden approach only works when Apple truly wants to improve the customer/user experience and not just pushing for greater profits.  If what being read in Steve Jobs’ biography written by Walter Isaacson are mostly true, then one could see Steve Jobs were more interested in making excellent products than just making more money.  It also explained how the come back of Steve Jobs to Apple board had allowed Apple not only survived the almost bankruptcy but thrived and became one of the most valuable companies in the country.  So, my point is that Apple might continue to rise even more by putting Steve Jobs’ original intention to work as in creating Apple wireless carrier.

On the side note:  Even Google is slowly experimenting in building its own broadband.  Perhaps too Google will build its own wireless carrier.  Why?  I think Google knows that it cannot be too happy to allow today major broadband and wireless carriers have all the saying in how Google users should use Google data.  Just imagine what if Internet users experience data throttling by major broadband and wireless carriers, how Google be sure its users would be able to enjoy Google data fully?  Google is in the business of marketing and more, and when users could not reach an ad or two and a service or two, it might be costly for Google’s bottom line to not do something to prevent such things from happening.  Should Apple take note from Google on the matter of creating one’s own broadband/wireless carrier?  I think very yes so!

Related articles

• What I Learned Building the Apple Store (blogs.hbr.org)
• Could Apple Still Launch Their Own Wireless Carrier? (q-ontech.blogspot.com)
• The Apple Wireless Carrier (Part 2) (mondaynote.com)
• Apple as a wireless carrier (guardian.co.uk)
• Steve Jobs Toyed With Idea Of Building His Own Wireless Carrier (forbes.com)
• Apple still might create a network separate from wireless carriers (amanwithaphd.wordpress.com)
• Apple still might create a network separate from wireless carriers (amanwithaphd.wordpress.com)
• Steve Jobs wanted to bypass cell carriers entirely (tuaw.com)
• Steve Jobs Wanted an iPhone-Only Wireless Network (apple.slashdot.org)
• Steve Jobs Had Plans For an Apple Cellular Network (news.dice.com)
• iShred Snowboard – In Tribute To Steve Jobs (thetechscoop.net)
• Vote: Who makes the better Steve Jobs, Clooney or Wylie? (tech.fortune.cnn.com)
• How Steve Jobs’ Vision for the Apple Store Changed Retail (vdeconline.wordpress.com)
• Steve Jobs “wanted to replace carriers” according to the father of T-Mobile (intomobile.com)
• Steve Jobs wanted to build a wireless carrier, but gave up (thenextweb.com)
• Steve Jobs Cried Lots Of Rivers In His Quest For Perfection (granniethegeek.com)
• Watch a candid Steve Jobs brainstorming with his team behind the scenes at NeXT (video) (9to5mac.com)
• George Clooney To Play Steve Jobs In Biopic!?! (perezhilton.com)
• A Perfect Critique Of Walter Isaacson’s Steve Jobs Biography (AAPL) (businessinsider.com)
• Silicon Alley Insider: Actually, NeXT Was A Huge Success (businessinsider.com)
• Kindle Fire dragged into Apple’s “app store” suit against Amazon (arstechnica.com)
• Apple’s New Chairman Thinks The Company Needs To Be Less Arrogant (AAPL) (businessinsider.com)
• Kindle Fire Dragged Into Apple’s ‘App Store’ Suit Against Amazon (wired.com)
• Steve Jobs, By Walter Isaacson (independent.co.uk)
• One on One: Walter Isaacson, Biographer of Steve Jobs (bits.blogs.nytimes.com)
• Steve Jobs biography — Isaacson blew it (daringfireball.net)
• George Clooney and Noah Wyle compete to play Steve Jobs in new film (mirror.co.uk)
• The New York Times goes one-on-one with Walter Isaacson (tuaw.com)

Such a thought saddened me, but WiGig gave me hope!  Knowing WiGig existed, there might be hope in our network horizon for that day would come where wasting data would be a bliss.  Connecting at extreme speed through wireless network without a care would definitely push for not so boring digital world.  Of course, it might be more volatile and chaotic and dangerous, but it might also be creative and interesting and interconnected.  I could not see myself in a boring digital world, because I might prefer to be either not knowing there was such a thing at all or having to see more of whatever that would drive the digital world into its own state of bliss.

Do I really want to worry about viewing too many HD videos on YouTube then?  Of course, because AT&T will charge overage bandwidth.  You will be charged with $10 per 50 GB of overage bandwidth.  Perhaps, AT&T wants to stop the competitors from making their instant streaming of movies over the web so popular, because AT&T is also serving U-Verse customers TV programs.

Anyhow, I think Netflix won’t be such a good idea when AT&T begins to impose its data cap plans.  For backing up my data to remote locations, I won’t be doing that also when AT&T starts to impose this crazy new rule.  Perhaps, I may have to look somewhere else for unlimited broadband.  What do you think about AT&T’s impending action of imposing data caps on customers?

Update:  I’ve failed to mention that gamers who use Internet for gaming may have to curb their gaming habit or pay up, because gaming isn’t the only thing the gamers do with their broadband connection.  Gamers who play World of Warcraft, Starcraft 2, and who use console games such as Xbox 360 to play game with friends over the Internet may go pass AT&T’s data cap limits.

Source:  http://www.ubergizmo.com/2011/03/att-set-to-impose-data-caps-on-u-verse-and-dsl-customers/